Note: The Payson Roundup does not necessarily agree with comments posted below - responsibility lies with the relevant user alone. Read our full policy.
Considering the luck people have in dealing with such things these days, I'm oficially changing the title of this string to: PWDID MS*2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
MS*2 = Change of MG2 to MS2, with asterisk to explain the S
S = "Stay."
Entire term, PSWID MS2 means. PSWID Must Stay 2 instead of PSWID Must Go 2.
Reason for post, ignoring the typo, if you folks are going to keep PSWID instead of, as I believe we should, separating it into two separate water districts, each of which can work for its own constituency, then there is no more I can add to what I have already said.
Tom, I am as frustrated as you are about the situation. I agree there is no more to say. I truly believe the current PSWID Board is acting in haste and has made some decisions which do not seem to be in the best interests of the taxpayers and water users. However, if the majority of the residents don't become more vocal and/or active there is nothing that can be done. I only hope that my impressions prove to be wrong and that the taxpayer and water users in Pine/Strawberry don't get taken to the cleaners.
Unfortunately, since the K-2 Well project seems to be abandoned and Milk Ranch water won't be available until some time after the purchase of the water companies is completed it will probably be several years before the residents of Pine are free of water hauling charges and finally have a sufficient water supply.
So, I,too, sign off on Pine/Strawberry water matters.
All of the following is an opinion and not an accusation.
I don't think Hardcastle will sell the water companies and I don't think there is any state dept. or law that can make him.
PSWID is not a municipality. Just a group of people that want to run things thier way with an attorney that seems to have a personal agenda in the whole thing.
It is like trying to p--- up a wet rope. (:
Post a comment
(Requires Payson.com registration. You will then need to request that your user details be verified.)
Note: The Payson Roundup does not necessarily agree with comments posted below - responsibility lies with the relevant user alone. Read our full policy.
Posted by Tom_Garrett (Tom Garrett) on May 9, 2008 at 1:54 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Continuation of earlier string, which was getting too long.
Posted by SantaBerry (Bernice Winandy) on May 10, 2008 at 7:20 p.m. (Suggest removal)
OK guys any comments about Barbara Hall's resignation. Did you read her comments in Friday's Payson Roundup?
Posted by Tom_Garrett (Tom Garrett) on May 10, 2008 at 11:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Considering the luck people have in dealing with such things these days, I'm oficially changing the title of this string to: PWDID MS*2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
* Stay.
Posted by SantaBerry (Bernice Winandy) on May 11, 2008 at 7:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom, your comment is a bit esoteric. Could you please explain PWDID MS*2. And the meaning of the rest of your comment?
Posted by Tom_Garrett (Tom Garrett) on May 11, 2008 at 2:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
May God smile upon you and yours on this Mothers Day.
Posted by Tom_Garrett (Tom Garrett) on May 12, 2008 at 2:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Bernice,
PWDID = TYPO. Should read PSWID.
MS*2 = Change of MG2 to MS2, with asterisk to explain the S
S = "Stay."
Entire term, PSWID MS2 means. PSWID Must Stay 2 instead of PSWID Must Go 2.
Reason for post, ignoring the typo, if you folks are going to keep PSWID instead of, as I believe we should, separating it into two separate water districts, each of which can work for its own constituency, then there is no more I can add to what I have already said.
Posted by SantaBerry (Bernice Winandy) on May 12, 2008 at 7:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Tom, I am as frustrated as you are about the situation. I agree there is no more to say. I truly believe the current PSWID Board is acting in haste and has made some decisions which do not seem to be in the best interests of the taxpayers and water users. However, if the majority of the residents don't become more vocal and/or active there is nothing that can be done. I only hope that my impressions prove to be wrong and that the taxpayer and water users in Pine/Strawberry don't get taken to the cleaners.
Unfortunately, since the K-2 Well project seems to be abandoned and Milk Ranch water won't be available until some time after the purchase of the water companies is completed it will probably be several years before the residents of Pine are free of water hauling charges and finally have a sufficient water supply.
So, I,too, sign off on Pine/Strawberry water matters.
Posted by patrandall (pat Randall) on May 12, 2008 at 10:37 p.m. (Suggest removal)
All of the following is an opinion and not an accusation.
I don't think Hardcastle will sell the water companies and I don't think there is any state dept. or law that can make him.
PSWID is not a municipality. Just a group of people that want to run things thier way with an attorney that seems to have a personal agenda in the whole thing.
It is like trying to p--- up a wet rope. (:
Post a comment
(Requires Payson.com registration. You will then need to request that your user details be verified.)